1/1/2024 0 Comments Mitsuye endo![]() On the occasion of the anniversary of the closing of the last of the camps, it is time to recognize Mitsuye Endo’s enormous personal sacrifice to accomplish that end and award her one of our nation’s highest honors, the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Supreme Court Transcript of Record with Supporting Pleadings PURCELL, JAMES C, Additional Contributors, U.S. The closing of the camps commenced within weeks of the decision, with the last-Tule Lake-closing seventy years ago, in 1946. Once the announcement came, the Court handed down Ex parte Endo the next day. Internal Court documents suggest that the Chief Justice held up the decision to give President Roosevelt time to act ahead of the Court and announce that the military would begin lifting evacuation orders and closing the camps. In the end, the Court unanimously sided with Endo, albeit in what was a narrow ruling that glossed over the broader constitutional problems with the internment policy. (As the government argued in its opposing brief to the Court, Endo “refuse” to apply for the necessary permit for release.) Endo’s stance resulted in her spending two additional years in internment camps while her case made its way to the Court. (Notably, when the military proposed the policy, several prominent lawyers in the Roosevelt Administration recognized that interning citizens would violate the Suspension Clause.)Īfter filing her habeas petition, Endo turned down the government’s offer of release in order to keep her case from becoming moot, eventually setting the stage for the Supreme Court finally to address the lawfulness of the internment policy. ![]() ![]() Endo’s habeas corpus petition posed the only direct challenge to the camps to reach the Supreme Court and invoked the Suspension Clause to argue-correctly-that the government had no general authority to detain citizens without criminal charges. The anniversary constitutes an appropriate occasion to recognize an unsung hero in the movement to close the internment camps: Mitsuye Endo. Her father represented Mitsuye Endo in Ex parte Endo, which resulted in the Supreme Court ruling that the government could not detain citizens who were loyal to the United States in December of 1944. The decision by the Supreme Court allowed Japanese-Americans to return to the West Coast and resettle. As a result of this ruling, the wartime relocation camps were closed, and the formerly incarcerated Japanese Americans were allowed to return to the West Coast.I published an op-ed today marking the seventieth anniversary of the closing of the last of the World War II “Relocation Centers” established by the federal government to intern Japanese Americans during the War. During the Ex parte Endo case, the Supreme Court ruled that the government could not continue to detain Mitsuye Endo in a concentration camp because she posed no danger to the United States. However, in ex parte Endo, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in her favor, deciding that the US government could not incarcerate citizens who were loyal to the United States. Season 2, Episode 5: Jay tells Alex about Mitsuye Endo, the only person to successfully sue for Habeus Corpus during the forced internment of Japanese. United States all resulted in convictions upheld and government restrictions uncontested by the Supreme Court. Endo’s case was the only one to successfully challenge Executive Order 9066.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |